The Congas System

This might be the dumbest idea I’ve ever had.

Are you tired of three-to-five-letter acronyms such as “TTRPG,” “FKR,” and “PbtA” that are cumbersome to say out loud and convey little to no information about what they actually mean? Say hello to congas! 

Congas is a new and fun way to talk about conversation games, or congas for short! A conga is any game where the core mechanic is developing a fictional scenario through conversation. (And yes, before you ask, solo games count too — you’re having a conversation with the prompts the game is giving you!)

Congas, as a system of talking about congas, only has three rules:

  1. You may only use a single, evocative, plain-language word to describe a genre of congas. Examples: Adventure congas, freeform congas, tactical congas. (Compound words or phrases like “soap opera conga” are permissible if they are sufficiently evocative.)
  2. You cannot elaborate as to what a genre of congas is or means. Your one evocative word is the only means by which you can define the genre. If you want to call your conga an adventure conga, but you think it’s very important to differentiate it from a different adventure conga, tough luck: either accept that the games are similar or use a different word.
  3. There is no canonical list of conga genres or hard lines as to what does and doesn’t belong to each genre. No one can tell you what is or isn’t an “adventure conga” or “tactical conga”; congas is method of communicating whatever categories are useful to you.

In short, congas is all about vibes. Some pre-existing terminology, like “mystery RPGs” and “horror RPGs,” translates well to congas (mystery congas, horror congas). Other conventional terminology like “story games” does not translate: “story” is not a specific and evocative word.

In congas, any given “story game” should be defined more specifically: The Quiet Year might be a “drawing conga,” while Powered by the Apocalypse games might be “playbook congas,” or something more descriptive of the specific game in question (Blades in the Dark could be a “heist conga”).

Do I expect this idea to take off? Probably not. Do I think it should take off? Even that is questionable. Would it be interesting? That’s for certain!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruins & Rogues vs. Maze Rats

Image
So after years of trying to design my perfect game, I finally have it in my hands... And what do you know, it turns out it's very similar to Maze Rats . Hell, its name is even made up of synonyms for "Maze" and "Rats." I didn't consciously set out to write a Maze Rats hack. This is just where I ended up. But why did I end up here, and if what I wanted was so similar to Maze Rats, why did I make a new game instead of just playing Maze Rats? I don't see many people talking about the actual rules of Maze Rats, I mostly see them talking about the tables, so this should be an interesting exercise. Similarities Before we analyze differences, let's take a look at what these games have in common. Both games use "control-panel" layout and fit their core rules on a two-page spread. Both games only use six-sided dice. Both games have quick character creation based on rolling PCs randomly. Both games use side initiative: on your side's turn, you ca
Read more

LORE DUMP: On the Origin of Gods, Monsters, Magic, and More

Image
The following post is about lore I'm thinking of using for my next campaign world. If you think you'd like to play in a game of mine some day, perhaps you'd rather discover it in-game alongside your character, if it even comes up at all. (Personally, I don't think it's much of a spoiler, and a little out-of-character knowledge might give you context for how your character would understand the world.) I. Sapient species produce souls. This phenomenon is poorly understood, but what is known is that, unless the soul's host experienced some serious trauma , the soul sinks to the center of the planet and joins a mass of soul-stuff called the World Will. A select few, called "prophets," are born with the ability to encounter aspects of the World Will through their dreams. Through such encounters, the prophets come to categorize, personify, and interact with such aspects, which they conceive of as "gods" or "spirits." (In truth, the manifo
Read more

Dead Theory Necromancy

Image
I. Introduction GNS theory is dead, but this post on the history of the Forge contains an interesting tidbit: As originally conceived, the rec.games.frp.advocacy threefold was based on the traditional RPG division of responsibilities between players and referees, and was proposed as a means of examining specific decisions on the part of a referee. It recognised three distinct criteria which a referee could use to make a call one way or another: Gamism , whereby the referee makes the call which they consider makes for the best gaming challenge for the players, Dramatism , whereby the referee makes the call which they consider makes for the best dramatic story, and Simulationism , whereby the referee tries to avoid metaplot considerations and come up with the ruling which makes logical sense based on the IC assumptions of the game world. An important point of the original model is that it assumed that people are not, by and large, consistent on this point; sometimes they’d favour syste
Read more